EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Demand, Control and its Relationship with Job Mobility among Young Workers

Elsy Verhofstadt, Hans De Witte and Eddy Omey
Additional contact information
Hans De Witte: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2009, vol. 30, issue 2, 266-293

Abstract: Karasek defined a stressful job as a job with an imbalance between the demands of the job and the control one can exercise in that job (a `high strain job'). Previous research showed that starters in a high strain job are indeed less satisfied. They are also not compensated for the high workload they face. This article raises the question whether this strain (`high strain job') is only temporary. The results of the duration analysis show that those starting in a high strain job leave their job significantly sooner than those in an `active' job. For many young workers, having a high strain job as the first job seems to be temporary. However, for a substantial segment of the young workforce, there is a considerable probability of remaining in high strain jobs. This finding determines the policy implication: the discussion on work stress should focus on those trapped in high strain jobs.

Keywords: duration analysis; job mobility; Karasek's Job Demand—Control model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X09102434 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:30:y:2009:i:2:p:266-293

DOI: 10.1177/0143831X09102434

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic and Industrial Democracy from Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2024-05-08
Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:30:y:2009:i:2:p:266-293