EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The relationship between the work unit’s conflict management styles and bullying at work: Moderation by conflict frequency

Elfi Baillien, Guy Notelaers, Hans De Witte and Stig Berge Matthiesen
Additional contact information
Elfi Baillien: KULeuven, Belgium, Elfi.Baillien@psy.kuleuven.be
Guy Notelaers: KULeuven, Belgium and University of Bergen, Norway
Hans De Witte: KULeuven, Belgium
Stig Berge Matthiesen: University of Bergen, Norway

Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2011, vol. 32, issue 3, 401-419

Abstract: This study investigates the relationship between the work unit’s conflict management styles and bullying at work. Inspired by the Dual Concern framework, the authors assume a positive relationship between avoiding, forcing and yielding and bullying and a negative relationship between problem-solving and bullying. Moreover, they expected these relationships to be intensified by conflict frequency. The results ( N = 5062) reveal an unsatisfactory fit when not taking into account conflict frequency as a moderator. A multigroup SEM accounting for the moderating role of conflict frequency (five groups) does yield an acceptable fit: the ‘very rarely’ and ‘yearly’ group, and the ‘monthly’ and ‘weekly’ group show equal path coefficients. The ‘daily’ conflict group has its own parameters. Forcing and avoiding associate positively and problem-solving associates negatively with bullying; and these relationships intensify as a function of conflict frequency. There is no relationship between yielding and bullying at work within the various conflict frequency groups.

Keywords: bullying at work; conflict management styles; Dual Concern Theory; mobbing; multigroup analyses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X10377929 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:32:y:2011:i:3:p:401-419

DOI: 10.1177/0143831X10377929

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic and Industrial Democracy from Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:32:y:2011:i:3:p:401-419