Labour productivity and innovation performance: The importance of internal labour flexibility practices
Paul TY Preenen,
Robert Vergeer,
Karolus Kraan and
Steven Dhondt
Additional contact information
Paul TY Preenen: TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, the Netherlands
Robert Vergeer: CE Delft, the Netherlands
Karolus Kraan: TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, the Netherlands
Steven Dhondt: TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, the Netherlands; KU Leuven, Belgium
Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2017, vol. 38, issue 2, 271-293
Abstract:
This article develops and examines the idea that internal labour flexibility practices are beneficial for labour productivity and innovation performance of companies. This is tested in two studies using unique company level datasets. In Study 1, results obtained from 377 independent companies revealed that internal labour flexibility practices are positively related to objective labour productivity and its growth in the year following, also when controlled for objective labour productivity and objective external labour flexibility from the year before. In Study 2, results obtained from 4271 companies indicated that internal labour flexibility practices were positively related to product innovation and labour productivity. Findings suggest that internal labour flexibility practices benefit both labour productivity and innovation performance of companies. If innovation and labour productivity are considered key to long-term survival, firms and policymakers should consider internal labour flexibility practices.
Keywords: Innovation performance; internal labour flexibility practices; labour flexibility; labour productivity; product innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X15572836 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:38:y:2017:i:2:p:271-293
DOI: 10.1177/0143831X15572836
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economic and Industrial Democracy from Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().