Collective action and labour militancy interrupted: Back-to-work legislation and the state of permanent exceptionalism at Air Canada

Andrew Stevens and Andrew Templeton
Additional contact information
Andrew Stevens: University of Regina, Canada
Andrew Templeton: Independent researcher, Canada

Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2020, vol. 41, issue 1, 6-28

Abstract: Using data collected from survey responses and interviews conducted in 2014, this study examines the consequences of back-to-work legislation from the perspective of customer service workers at Air Canada represented by Unifor Local 2002. By examining union attitudes, opinions of strikes, wildcat actions and back-to-work legislation deployed in 2011 and 2012, the study concludes that this type of legislation functioned to protect the interests of the employer in an ongoing process of corporate restructuring. Such ad hoc legislative measures, defined by political economists as ‘permanent exceptionalism’, further undermines the industrial pluralist regime that is the foundation of Canadian labour relations.

Keywords: Air Canada; back-to-work legislation; industrial pluralism; union attitudes; wildcat action (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X16682306 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:41:y:2020:i:1:p:6-28

DOI: 10.1177/0143831X16682306

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic and Industrial Democracy from Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().