Employers’ views on flexible employment contracts for younger workers: Benefits, downsides and societal outlook

Lin Rouvroye, Hendrik van Dalen, Kène Henkens and Joop J Schippers
Additional contact information
Lin Rouvroye: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW); University of Groningen (RUG), the Netherlands
Kène Henkens: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW); University of Groningen (RUG), University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), the Netherlands; University of Amsterdam (UVA), Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, the Netherlands
Joop J Schippers: Utrecht University (UU), Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, the Netherlands

Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2022, vol. 43, issue 4, 1934-1957

Abstract: Employers are instrumental in the growth of non-standard employment, which exposes predominantly younger workers to higher levels of insecurity. Using an interdisciplinary theoretical lens, this article identifies which considerations, both positive and negative, underlie employers’ decision making with regard to the use of flexible contracts for younger workers and discusses how employers perceive future implications of an increasingly flexible labour market. Findings are based on interviews with 26 managers, HR professionals and directors working in different sectors of industry in the Netherlands: local government, education, health care, retail, corporate services and transport and logistics. While acknowledging benefits to the use of flexible contracts, interviewed employers also reported downsides to this practice. Using flexible contracts complicates retention of young talent, deters investment in training, negatively affects social morale on the work floor and puts pressure on younger workers. Interviewees did not deem employers primarily responsible for monitoring societal consequences of an increasingly flexible labour market and often did not see the bigger picture of how increased flexibility could have negative societal consequences. The findings suggest that corrective actions will not come from the side of employers.

Keywords: Employer perspective; flexible contracts; non-standard employment; qualitative research; younger workers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X211053378 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:43:y:2022:i:4:p:1934-1957

DOI: 10.1177/0143831X211053378

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic and Industrial Democracy from Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().