 Abusive supervision and enacted aggression in unionized workplaces: The role of union support and industrial relations climateE. Kevin Kelloway, Arla Day and Lori Francis Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2025, vol. 46, issue 3, 664-683 Abstract: Drawing on industrial relations climate theory, in this article the authors hypothesize that abusive supervision results in a negative industrial relations climate which, in turn, is associated with increased employees’ enacted aggression. Moreover, union support was posited as a moderator of both the indirect and direct effects of abusive supervision. Data from 211 union members in Canada supported both processes. Union support moderated the link between industrial relations climate and enacted aggression such that the indirect effect of abusive supervision on aggression was significant at medium and high, but not at low, levels of union support. Moreover, union support moderated the direct relationship between abusive supervision and enacted aggression, such that this relationship was weaker when union support was high. The results suggest that unionization plays an important role in mitigating the effects of abusive supervision and, as such, plays a role in the development of a healthier workplace. Keywords: abusive supervision; enacted aggression; industrial relations climate; labor unions; union support (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:664-683 DOI: 10.1177/0143831X251351542 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Economic and Industrial Democracy from Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.