To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory
Magnus Henrekson (),
Dan Johansson and
Johan Karlsson
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2024, vol. 48, issue 1, 104-140
Abstract:
Based on a review of 700+ peer-reviewed articles since 1990, identified using text mining methodology and supervised machine learning, we analyze how neo-Schumpeterian growth theorists relate to the entrepreneur-centered view of Schumpeter Mark I and the entrepreneurless framework of Schumpeter Mark II. The literature leans heavily toward Schumpeter Mark II; innovation returns are modeled as following an ex ante known probability distribution. By assuming that innovation outcomes are (probabilistically) deterministic, the entrepreneur becomes redundant. Abstracting from genuine uncertainty, implies that central issues regarding the economic function of the entrepreneur are overlooked such as the roles of proprietary resources, skills, and profits.
Keywords: creative destruction; economic growth; entrepreneur; innovation; judgment; Knightian uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10422587221141679 (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory (2023) 
Working Paper: To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory (2023) 
Working Paper: To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory (2022) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:entthe:v:48:y:2024:i:1:p:104-140
DOI: 10.1177/10422587221141679
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().