Stagnation in Housing Production: Another Success in the Dutch â€˜Planner's Paradiseâ€™?
Willem Korthals Altes
Environment and Planning B, 2006, vol. 33, issue 1, 97-114
There are a number of different criteria for measuring the success of plans in planning. In the planning literature there is a debate about the criterion of conformance (that is, whether spatial development is according to plan) as opposed to performance (that is, whether the plan has shown the way to better decisionmaking), which is, in fact, different from performance measurement. In this paper both criteria are applied to measure the success of Dutch national concentration policies in the â€œFourth Memorandum on Spatial Planningâ€”Plusâ€ . The author shows that the urban containment policies conform well to the plan but perform badly in terms of improving current decisionmaking on the stagnation of housing production in the Netherlands. Moreover, the present stagnation of housing production is planned stagnation. With this result, the author shows that conformance and performance are independent criteria for measuring planning success, and that plans (as set out in the â€œFourth Memorandum on Spatial Planningâ€”Plusâ€ ) with high conformance may still perform badly on the performance criterion.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirb:v:33:y:2006:i:1:p:97-114
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Environment and Planning B
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().