An Evaluation of the Methodology and Results of J. P. Goldstein's Study, "the Effects of Motorcycle Helmet Use On the Probability of Fatality and the Severity of Head and Neck Injuries"

Iqbal S. Bedi
Additional contact information
Iqbal S. Bedi: Alberta Transportation Safety Branch

Evaluation Review, 1987, vol. 11, issue 5, 670-677

Abstract: The motorcycle helmet effectiveness study conducted by J. P. Goldstein (1986) suggests that there exists a possible "trade-off" between head and neck injuries for a potential helmet user. Some groups have cited this study and have suggested that the current status of the mandatory helmet usage law in Alberta be reviewed. In this article, methodology and results of Goldstein's study are presented and evaluated, and evidence from other studies is presented. Due to methodological weaknesses in Goldstein's study, its results cannot be relied upon for policy formulation, particularly the repeal ofmandatory helmet legislation. Evidence from other studies provides no conclusive evidence of the trade-off between head and neck injuries for a motorcyclist wearing a helmet. The review of other studies indicates that helmets protect motorcycle riders from both head and neck injuries and that the risk of being killed is much higher jor helmetless riders. Perhaps, through helmet restraining collars or use of lighter helmets, both head and neck injuries can be further minimized.

Date: 1987
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8701100506 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:11:y:1987:i:5:p:670-677

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8701100506

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().