Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection

Marianne Goodfellow, Nancy-Ellen Kiernan, Frank Ahern and Michael A. Smyer
Additional contact information
Marianne Goodfellow: Pennsylvania State University
Nancy-Ellen Kiernan: Pennsylvania State University
Frank Ahern: Pennsylvania State University
Michael A. Smyer: Pennsylvania State University

Evaluation Review, 1988, vol. 12, issue 6, 638-654

Abstract: Researchers examining the effects of programs, in this case a state-level pharmaceutical assistance program for the elderly, sometimes must rely on multiple methods of data collection. Two-stage data collection (e.g., a telephone interview followed by a mail questionnaire) was used to obtain a full range of information. Older age groups were found to participate less frequently in the telephone interview, while certain demographic factors characterized mail questionnaire nonparticipants, all of which supports past research. Results also show that those in the poorest health are less likely to participate in the mail survey. Combining the two methods did not result in high attrition, suggesting that innovation can be successfully employed. Knowledge of the bias associated with each method will aid in targeting special groups.

Date: 1988
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8801200604 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:12:y:1988:i:6:p:638-654

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8801200604

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().