The Impact of Design Effects On Standard Errors in Roadside Traffic Surveys

Paul S. Maxim
Additional contact information
Paul S. Maxim: University of Western Ontario

Evaluation Review, 1989, vol. 13, issue 2, 157-173

Abstract: For the most part, random roadside traffic surveys represent complex rather than simple random samples. It is known that the design effects due to clustering, for example, often inflate the standard errors of various point estimates calculated from such surveys. This study examines the design effects in random roadside surveys conducted in three Canadian provinces in 1981. Calculating the standard errors of ratio meansforfour BA C categories, four age categories and gender in those surveys, two major conclusions were drawn. First, the calculated design effects (DEFF) were all greater than 1.0, rangingfrom 1.90 to 32.26. This implies that the standard errors of the estimates are from 1.38 to 5.68 times larger than would be obtained from simple random samples of the same size. Clustering and unequal weighting both had a major impact on increasing the overall DEFF, while countervailing stratification procedures did not reduce the effect. Second, the design effects varied considerably across the surveys even though the same basic sampling strategy was employed in all three. Further, the design effects also varied across subcategories of the same variable.

Date: 1989
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8901300204 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:13:y:1989:i:2:p:157-173

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8901300204

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().