Methodologies for Evaluating the Impact of Contraceptive Social Marketing Programs

Jane T. Bertrand, John Stover and Robert Porter
Additional contact information
Jane T. Bertrand: Tulane University
John Stover: The Futures Group
Robert Porter: Doremus, Porter, Novelli

Evaluation Review, 1989, vol. 13, issue 4, 323-354

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of evaluation issues with regard to CSM programs. The diversity of research to be conducted, the methodological and logistic difficulties involved, and the problems in interpreting certain results may seem daunting. In fact, this helps to explain the relative dearth of evaluation research on CSM programs to date (although much more is expected to emerge on this subject in the next two to three years). However, CSM as a means of family planning service delivery is growing rapidly in numerous developing countries around the world. Behind this is a significant financial investment on the part of donor a gencies, and thus a great need on the part of the population community to learn more about the impact of CSM programs.

Date: 1989
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8901300401 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:13:y:1989:i:4:p:323-354

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8901300401

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().