Peer Review Practices of Mass Communication Scholarly Journals

Larry Z. Leslie
Additional contact information
Larry Z. Leslie: University of South Florida, Tampa

Evaluation Review, 1990, vol. 14, issue 2, 151-165

Abstract: Research and publication are important to today 's teacher-scholar. Gettingpublished in refereed journals is considered by many the surest way to tenure and promotion. Peer review has not been a popular area of study, but, increasingly, questions are being raised about current peer review practices in a variety of disciplines, including mass communication. This study examines peer review practices in mass communication. Results indicate that both researchers and referees have mixed feelings about peer review and about specific journals, but that they are dissatisfied with particular philosophies that underlie scholarship in the discipline.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9001400203 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:14:y:1990:i:2:p:151-165

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9001400203

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().