A Multivariate Logit Analysis of the Outcomes of Arbitration Decisions in British Columbia

Richard A. Holmes, Robert Rogow and S. Stuart Maynes
Additional contact information
Richard A. Holmes: Simon Fraser University
Robert Rogow: Simon Fraser University
S. Stuart Maynes: Simon Fraser University

Evaluation Review, 1990, vol. 14, issue 3, 247-263

Abstract: A major conclusion drawn from this study is that bivariate estimates of the probability of management or union wins in grievance arbitration cases can be seriously in error as a result of the failure of these estimates to adjust for the effects of variables not included in the bivariate comparison. In this analysis of 1,815 arbitration cases occurring in British Columbia in the 1982 to 1985 period, bias is identified in the bivariate estimates of the probability of management wins by industry and issue. In addition, from application of a multivariate logit model, the study estimates the effect on arbitration outcome of industry, union size, union arbitration proneness, issue, arbitration experience, union occupation, and year. Similarities to and differences from the findings of previous studies are identified.

Date: 1990
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9001400302 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:14:y:1990:i:3:p:247-263

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9001400302

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().