Random Measurement Error Does Not Bias the Treatment Effect Estimate in the Regression-Discontinuity Design

William M.K. Trochim, Joseph C. Cappelleri and Charles S. Reichardt
Additional contact information
William M.K. Trochim: Cornell University
Joseph C. Cappelleri: Cornell University
Charles S. Reichardt: University of Denver

Evaluation Review, 1991, vol. 15, issue 5, 571-604

Abstract: This article examines the regression-discontinuity (RD) design when there is random measure ment error and a treatment interaction effect. Two simulation issues -the specification of the pretest-posttest functional form and the choice of the point-of-estimation of the treatment effect- are examined Traditionally, an interaction effect in the general linear model has been con structed after centering the true scores by subtracting their mean. However, because the RD design has traditionally estimated the treatment effect at the cutoff, one is liable to obtain an apparently biased treatment effect that is actually attributable to the misspecification with regard to the point-of-estimation. Formulas are provided that allow one to control exactly in simulations the magnitude of a treatment effect at any point-of-estimation. These formulas can also be used for simulating the randomized experimental (RE) case where estimation is not at the pretest mean.

Date: 1991
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9101500504 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:15:y:1991:i:5:p:571-604

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9101500504

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().