Linear Versus Nonlinear Analysis in the Measurement of Effects in a Quasi-Experimental Design

Marcel W. Vooijs and Leo J. Th. Van Der Kamp
Additional contact information
Marcel W. Vooijs: Leiden University, Center for Child and Media Studies
Leo J. Th. Van Der Kamp: Leiden University, Center for Child and Media Studies

Evaluation Review, 1991, vol. 15, issue 5, 625-638

Abstract: In this study, a two-step procedure for the analysis of pretest-posttest data is developed and illustrated. In the first step, a nonlinear canonical correlation analysis was conducted on data from a pretest-posttest control group design. This technique transforms the measure of the pretests (including the scores on the treatment variable) and the posttests in such a way that they become interrelated linearly and possible deviations from the linear model due to nonlinearity have been minimized. In the second step, the resulting optimally scaled set of pretest and posttest measures were analyzed using covariance procedures to assess program effects. The resultant variance appeared to be increased substantially, either by a better prediction of posttest scores from pretest scores, by a better estimation of the effect of the treatment, or by both. It is concluded that the two-step procedure indeed has important advantages.

Date: 1991
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9101500506 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:15:y:1991:i:5:p:625-638

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9101500506

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().