EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing the Effectiveness of Research Organizations

James W. Altschuld and Henry Y. Zheng
Additional contact information
James W. Altschuld: Ohio State University
Henry Y. Zheng: Ohio State University

Evaluation Review, 1995, vol. 19, issue 2, 197-216

Abstract: Assessing the effectiveness of research organizations in education (as well as those in the social sciences) is hampered by the lack of measurable goals and identifiable outcome criteria. In this review, key issues in evaluating effectiveness are identified and insights on the application of major assessment approaches are provided. Most research organizations in education tend to have ambiguous goals and incomplete technologies or strategies for achieving them. The goal-attainment approach with its emphasis on efficiency and output measures tells only a limited story of effectiveness. The stakeholder approach, emphasizing social references and extrinsic measures, is more relevant, for it indicates the extent to which stakeholders'needs are satisfied. The systems approach is useful in sensitizing evaluators to the importance of internal processes in improving organizational effectiveness. The competing values framework is an attempt to integrate major assessment paradigms. It shows that value trade-offs are inherent in the selection of evaluation approaches. Understanding an organization's focus, structure, and outcome will facilitate the ultimate choice of effectiveness criteria and evaluation strategies .

Date: 1995
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9501900205 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:2:p:197-216

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9501900205

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:2:p:197-216