Maximizing Response to Surveys in Health Program Evaluation At Minimum Cost Using Multiple Methods

Neil Atherton Day, David R. Dunt and Susan Day
Additional contact information
Neil Atherton Day: University of Melbourne
David R. Dunt: University of Melbourne
Susan Day: University of Melbourne

Evaluation Review, 1995, vol. 19, issue 4, 436-450

Abstract: This article shows how the use of multiple methods of follow-up can enhance the rate of response to mail questionnaires. The field design reported here consisted of an initial approach by mail, followed by reminder letters, telephone calls, and personal visits to nonrespondents. This procedure resulted in accurate identification of persons who, although included in the sampling frame, were not in the target population. This effectively removed from the sample about 12% of initially selected persons who were "out-of scope. " The follow-up activities also increased the response rate by persuading many initial nonrespondents to return questionnaires. The general elements of the design are suggested for consideration by evaluators seeking high response rates using data collection strategies that are realistic given the budgets available in small to medium size evaluations. The procedures are particularly useful in circumstances where the sampling frame is suspected of including cases outside the scope of the study .

Date: 1995
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9501900405 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:4:p:436-450

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9501900405

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().