An Evaluator's Guide To Detecting Attrition Problems

E. Michael Foster and Leonard Bickman
Additional contact information
E. Michael Foster: Vanderbilt University
Leonard Bickman: Vanderbilt University

Evaluation Review, 1996, vol. 20, issue 6, 695-723

Abstract: This article reviews simple methods for detecting problematic attrition (nonresponse) in longitudinal evaluations. It begins by discussing nonresponse more generally and considers three situations that the evaluator is likely to encounter: (a) simple cross-sectional comparisons of treatment and control groups, (b) regression-based analyses of cross-sectional data on treatment and control groups, and (c) regression-based analyses of data from a longitudinal evaluation. The last is the focus of this article; the first 2 are discussed to provide the reader with the necessary background The article then discusses means of detecting attrition problems in longitudinal evaluations Model-based solutions are computationally demanding, but the article discusses simple tests for detecting problematic attrition. These methods are then illustrated using data from the Fort Bragg Evaluation, a longitudinal evaluation of a major demonstration in the field of children's mental health services. The analyses presented here do not suggest that attrition distorted the findings of that evaluation .

Date: 1996
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9602000603 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:20:y:1996:i:6:p:695-723

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9602000603

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().