When is an HIV Infection Prevented and when is it Merely Delayed?

Steven D. Pinkerton, Harrell W. Chesson, David R. Holtgrave, William Kassler and Peter M. Layde
Additional contact information
Steven D. Pinkerton: Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin
Harrell W. Chesson: National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
David R. Holtgrave: National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
William Kassler: National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Peter M. Layde: Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin

Evaluation Review, 2000, vol. 24, issue 3, 251-271

Abstract: HIV prevention programs are typically evaluated using behavioral outcomes. Mathematical models of HIV transmission can be used to translate these behavioral outcomes into estimates of the number of HIV infections averted. Usually, intervention effectiveness is evaluated over a brief assessment period and an infection is considered to be prevented if it does not occur during this period. This approach may overestimate intervention effectiveness if participants continue to engage in risk behaviors. Conversely, this strategy underestimates the true impact of interventions by assuming that behavioral changes persist only until the end of the intervention assessment period. In this article, the authors (a) suggest a simple framework for distinguishing between HIV infections that are truly prevented and those that are merely delayed, (b) illustrate how these outcomes can be estimated, (c) discuss strategies for extrapolating intervention effects beyond the assessment period, and (d) highlight the implications of these findings for HIV prevention decision making.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X0002400301 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:24:y:2000:i:3:p:251-271

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0002400301

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().