EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Statistical Power for Nonequivalent Pretest-Posttest Designs

J. Michael Oakes and Henry A. Feldman
Additional contact information
J. Michael Oakes: New England Research Institutes
Henry A. Feldman: New England Research Institutes

Evaluation Review, 2001, vol. 25, issue 1, 3-28

Abstract: Nonequivalent controlled pretest-posttest designs are central to evaluation science, yet no practical and unified approach for estimating power in the two most widely used analytic approaches to these designs exists. This article fills the gap by presenting and comparing useful, unified power formulas for ANCOVA and change-score analyses, indicating the implications of each on sample-size requirements. The authors close with practical recommendations for evaluators. Mathematical details and a simple spreadsheet approach are included in appendices.

Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X0102500101 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:25:y:2001:i:1:p:3-28

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0102500101

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:25:y:2001:i:1:p:3-28