A Short History of Randomized Experiments in Criminology
David P. Farrington
Evaluation Review, 2003, vol. 27, issue 3, 218-227
This article discusses advantages of randomized experiments and key issues raised in the following articles. The main concern is the growth and decrease in the use of randomized experiments by the California Youth Authority, the U.S. National Institute of Justice, and the British Home Office, although other experiments are also discussed. It is concluded that feast and famine periods are influenced by key individuals. It is recommended that policy makers, practitioners, funders, the mass media, and the general public need better education in research quality so that they can tell the difference between good and poor evaluation studies. They might then demand better evaluations using randomized experiments.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:27:y:2003:i:3:p:218-227
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().