Randomize Groups, Not Individuals

Robert G. St.Pierre and Peter H. Rossi
Additional contact information
Robert G. St.Pierre: STP Associates, Breckenridge, Colorado
Peter H. Rossi: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Evaluation Review, 2006, vol. 30, issue 5, 656-685

Abstract: Until the past few years, our nation's approach to designing federal programs for preschool-age children lacked coherence and paid little attention to what had worked (and not worked) in the past. In this article, the authors propose that credible information useful for designing effective programs will require the ongoing, systematic development and evaluation of alternative approaches for the improvement of large-scale early childhood programs. The research should place greater reliance on experiments in which existing groups of individuals, such as intact classes or preschool agencies, are randomly assigned to implement competing early education programs or program components. Randomizing groups, rather than individual children, changes the research question from “What works?†to “What works better?†yielding more useful information than is currently available about which preschool approaches ought to be strongly embedded in our nation's social policy.

Keywords: child care quality; group randomization; study evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X06291533 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:30:y:2006:i:5:p:656-685

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X06291533

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().