EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is Access Sufficient? An Examination of the Effects of the MedShare Program to Expand Access to Prescription Drugs for Indigent Populations

Thomas Shaw and Mark Carrozza
Additional contact information
Thomas Shaw: University of South Alabama, Mobile, tshaw@usouthal.edu
Mark Carrozza: Institute for Policy Research, Cincinnati, Ohio

Evaluation Review, 2008, vol. 32, issue 6, 526-546

Abstract: We conduct an evaluation of MedShare, a program designed to enhance access to prescription drugs for indigent patients in the Greater Cincinnati area. The program expands access to drugs by providing subsidies to reduce the costs paid by patients for their prescriptions. The assumption is that by expanding access to prescription drugs, participant health outcomes as measured by quality of life improve. Although the program appears outwardly successful, we found little difference between program participants and comparison groups. We feel that these findings point to a major flaw with existing health policy: access alone is not sufficient to improve health outcomes. Too often programs are created and, provided they show outwards signs of success (e.g., enrollment and utilization), are assumed to be improving the health of the community. Our findings indicate that one must look beyond just expanding access to ensure that programs are indeed achieving their overall objectives.

Keywords: health; prescriptions; evaluation; policy; access (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X08315884 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:32:y:2008:i:6:p:526-546

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X08315884

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:32:y:2008:i:6:p:526-546