Metric Properties of the Neighborhood Inventory for Environmental Typology (NIfETy): An Environmental Assessment Tool for Measuring Indicators of Violence, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Exposures
C.D.M. Furr-Holden,
K.D.M. Campbell,
A.J. Milam,
M.J. Smart,
N.A. Ialongo and
P.J. Leaf
Additional contact information
C.D.M. Furr-Holden: Department of Mental Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA, dholden@jhsph.edu
K.D.M. Campbell: Department of Mental Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
A.J. Milam: Department of Mental Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
M.J. Smart: Department of Mental Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
N.A. Ialongo: Department of Mental Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
P.J. Leaf: Department of Mental Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Evaluation Review, 2010, vol. 34, issue 3, 159-184
Abstract:
Objectives: Establish metric properties of the Neighborhood Inventory for Environmental Typology (NIfETy). Method: A total of 919 residential block faces were assessed by paired raters using the NIfETy. Reliability was evaluated via interrater and internal consistency reliability; validity by comparing NIfETy data with youth self-reported violence, alcohol, and other drug exposure and crime statistics. Results: Validity and reliability metrics were moderate to exemplary for the total scale and subscales. NIfETy data correlated strongly with crime data and youth self-reported exposure. Conclusions: The NIfETy is valid and reliable. Future investigations will explore its use in other urban centers and association to other health outcomes.
Keywords: adolescent health; neighborhood; innercity; reliability; validity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X10368493 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:34:y:2010:i:3:p:159-184
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X10368493
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().