Exploring Methods to Investigate Sentencing Decisions

Elizabeth L. C. Merrall, Mandeep K. Dhami and Sheila M. Bird
Additional contact information
Elizabeth L. C. Merrall: MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, United Kingdom, elizabeth.merrall@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk
Mandeep K. Dhami: University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology, Faculty of Law, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Sheila M. Bird: MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Department of Statistics and Modelling Science, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Evaluation Review, 2010, vol. 34, issue 3, 185-219

Abstract: The determinants of sentencing are of much interest in criminal justice and legal research. Understanding the determinants of sentencing decisions is important for ensuring transparent, consistent, and justifiable sentencing practice that adheres to the goals of sentencing, such as the punishment, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation of the offender, as well as reparation for the victim. It is important to frame research questions on sentencing that can feasibly be answered by appropriate research methods, within the constraints of limited time and resources. For illustration, this article presents three methodological approaches for investigating the factors that may influence sentencing decisions: multilevel analysis using existing sentencing data; sampling of, and data collection from, sentenced court case files; and experimental designs involving sentencers deciding on hypothetical cases. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are compared and discussed.

Keywords: research techniques; court decisions; multilevel; sampling; experimental (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X10369624 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:34:y:2010:i:3:p:185-219

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X10369624

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().