An Evaluation of Rural Health Care Research

Robert Kane, Marilyn Dean and Marian Solomon
Additional contact information
Robert Kane: Rand Corporation and the University of California at Los Angeles
Marilyn Dean: Rand Corporation
Marian Solomon: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare

Evaluation Review, 1979, vol. 3, issue 2, 139-189

Abstract: This article reviews the state of the art of rural health research and evaluation with par ticular emphasis on the questions of access, health personnel, and financing. The current state of knowledge both in the published and in the unpublished literature in each area is summarized and a series of unresolved issues is proposed. A strategy for further research to include the various types of rural health care programs is described. Major findings suggest that, although rural populations do have somewhat less access to care than do urban populations, our ability to quantify precisely the extent and importance of this discrepancy is underdeveloped. Despite a substantial investment in a variety of rural health care programs there is inadequate information as to their effectiveness. Programs designed to increase the supply of health personnel to rural areas have met with mixed success. Sites staffed by National Health Service Corps personnel show consistently lower productivity than do sites under other sponsorship. Nonphysician personnel (physician assistants and nurse practitioners) offer apromising source of primary carefor rural areas; recent legislation that reimburses such care should increase their utilization. A persistent problem is the expectation (often a mandate) incorporated into many rural health care demonstration efforts that the programs become financially self-sufficient in a finite period of time. Self-sufficiency is a function of utilization, productivity, and the ability to recover charges for services. In many instances stringent enforcement of the self-suf ficiency requirement may mean those those who need the services most will be least likely to receive them.

Date: 1979
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X7900300201 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:3:y:1979:i:2:p:139-189

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X7900300201

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().