The Ethics of Evaluation Researchers

Sherri N. Sheinfeld and Gary L. Lord
Additional contact information
Sherri N. Sheinfeld: Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital Philadelphia
Gary L. Lord: Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital Philadelphia

Evaluation Review, 1981, vol. 5, issue 3, 377-391

Abstract: This exploratory study examines (1) the values of evaluation research practitioners in response to ethical statements demanding a value choice and (2) the relationship between evaluator value choices and five hypothetical value dimensions relevant to more mature groups of professionals. Preliminary findings indicate that scaling, comparison, and analysis of evaluator value choices are feasible and may identify whatever consensus exists. Value conflicts exist among evaluation practioners, particularly around more esoteric concepts such as sharing and client loyalty versus distributive justice. The implications of multiple value conflictsfor the further growth of evaluation as a profession are discussed.

Date: 1981
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8100500306 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:5:y:1981:i:3:p:377-391

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8100500306

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().