Measuring Program Outcome

David Ihilevich, Goldine C. Gleser, Gordon W. Gritter, Lenore J. Kroman and Andrew S. Watson
Additional contact information
David Ihilevich: Shiawassee County Community Mental Health Center
Goldine C. Gleser: University of Cincinnati
Gordon W. Gritter: Michigan State University
Lenore J. Kroman: University of Michigan
Andrew S. Watson: University of Michigan

Evaluation Review, 1981, vol. 5, issue 4, 451-477

Abstract: The Progress Evaluation Scales (PES) provide an efficient measuring devicefor evaluating current functioning, setting treatment goals, and assessing change over time in clinically relevant aspects of personal, social, and community adjustment. The PES can be completed by patients, significant others, and therapists, making it possible to obtain various points of view of the outcome of mental health services. This article describes the seven domains measured by the PES and the underlying dimensions they were designed to tap, and presents the generalizability, validity, and usefulness of the scales as applied to an adult mental health center population.

Date: 1981
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8100500402 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:5:y:1981:i:4:p:451-477

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8100500402

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().