Linked Raters' Judgments

George S. Howard and Scott E. Maxwell
Additional contact information
George S. Howard: University of Notre Dame
Scott E. Maxwell: University of Houston

Evaluation Review, 1982, vol. 6, issue 1, 140-146

Abstract: The traditional procedure for obtaining judges' ratings to ascertain if treatment-related change has occurred involves the randomization of the materials to be rated and the separation of pretest from posttest materials. An alternative approach (linked judgments) is offered as a potential solution to certain instrumentation-related threats to statistical conclusion validity of the incumbent rating procedure. Data are presented which suggest that linked raters' judgments might provide a more powerful index of treatment effectiveness than the traditional procedure.

Date: 1982
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8200600110 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:6:y:1982:i:1:p:140-146

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8200600110

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().