Benefit-Cost Analysis and Medical Care Delivery System Change

Jon B. Christianson and Steven G. Bender
Additional contact information
Jon B. Christianson: University of Arizona
Steven G. Bender: State of Montana

Evaluation Review, 1982, vol. 6, issue 4, 481-504

Abstract: This article utilizes benefit-cost analysis to evaluate a hypothetical rural hospital closure. The estimated benefits were found to be extremely sensitive to assumptions concerning the nature of hospital marginal cost curves and less sensitive to the proportion of the hospital bill assumed to be paid directly by consumers. The net benefits of a hospital closure were largest in the case where hospital alternatives were small, under-utilized facilities. The analysis suggests that when evaluating medical delivery system change, benefit-cost techniques can be useful to policymakers in structuring the problem and identifying key assumptions. However, theoretical considerations in combination with data and resource requirements will limit its usefulness as an applied health-planning tool.

Date: 1982
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8200600402 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:6:y:1982:i:4:p:481-504

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8200600402

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().