Use of Synthetic Data in Dealing With Self-Selection

Eric Hirst, John Trimble, Richard Goeltz and N. Scott Cardell
Additional contact information
Eric Hirst: Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
John Trimble: Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Richard Goeltz: Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
N. Scott Cardell: Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Evaluation Review, 1983, vol. 7, issue 6, 807-830

Abstract: Because energy conservation programs are generally voluntary , participating households are different from nonparticipants in important, energy-related ways. This self-selection bias complicates efforts to estimate energy savings due to these programs. This article discusses several methods for dealing with self-selection. The choices include nonrandom sampling of program nonparticipants , binary choice models that explicitly treat house hold decisions to participate and to retrofit, or use of both methods. Because some of the methods discussed are new and have not yet been applied to analysis of energy conserva tion programs, we developed a "synthetic "data set. We conducted numerical experiments with this data to examine the performance of these different methods. These experiments show that the improved sample design and analytical techniques generally yield more accurate estimates of program energy savings. Our experience also suggests that a small , well-defined synthetic data set is helpful in developing , debugging , and evaluating soft ware associated with new analytical approaches .

Date: 1983
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8300700606 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:7:y:1983:i:6:p:807-830

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8300700606

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().