Conservation Program Evaluations

Tim M. Newcomb
Additional contact information
Tim M. Newcomb: Seattle City Light

Evaluation Review, 1984, vol. 8, issue 3, 425-440

Abstract: The Seattle City Light Department evaluated its weatherization program for low-income homeowners to determine how much electricity was conserved, and whether the program was cost-effective. The study employed a control group offuture program participants in order to avoid the biased estimate that could result because participants are a voluntary, nonrandom group of utility customers. Surveys, energy audits, and electricity meter data confirmed the similarity of the experimental and control groups prior to home weatherization. Following the installation of conservation measures, the consumption of the experimental group declined by an average of 3400 Kwh per year, when compared with the control group. This experimental design is believed to have nullified the potential biases due to selection, testing, regression, history, and instrumentation. The bias due to mortality, defined in this study as customer turnover, was seen to be very minor. This design can be applied to evaluate programs that operate continuously, provided that the guidelines for the program do not change and that clearly defined measurements of program success are available.

Date: 1984
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8400800308 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:8:y:1984:i:3:p:425-440

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8400800308

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().