Job Mobility and Earnings over the Life Cycle

George Borjas

ILR Review, 1981, vol. 34, issue 3, 365-376

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that in the short run quits generally lead to wage increases on the next job and layoffs to no increase or to a wage cut. The author of this study argues, however, that the prospect of a job change for any reason creates a disincentive for a worker to invest in training that is specific to the current job, and therefore those who change jobs frequently may earn less over their life cycle than those who, other things equal, seldom change jobs. An analysis of data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Mature Men supports that expectation, showing that for white males job separations usually lead to wage gains in the short run but nonmobile workers tend to achieve significantly higher wages over the long run.

Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/34/3/365.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Job Mobility and Earnings Over the Life Cycle (1978)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:34:y:1981:i:3:p:365-376

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in ILR Review from Cornell University, ILR School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().