The Credibility of Drug Tests: A Multi-Stage Bayesian Analysis

Darold T. Barnum and John M. Gleason

ILR Review, 1994, vol. 47, issue 4, 610-621

Abstract: The authors show that even when drug tests are extremely accurate by conventional measures, under some circumstances they will yield a high “false accusation rate†(that is, a high percentage of those testing positive for drugs will not have drugs in their systems). For example, if a drug-testing process that produces only one false positive per 2,000 drug-free specimens, and no false negatives, is administered to a population in which 0.1% of the people use the targeted drugs, one-third of those identified as drug users will be falsely accused. The authors propose a multi-stage Bayesian algorithm—an approach commonly used in management science but novel to industrial relations—that assures that a drug-testing process will have a low enough false accusation rate to provide credible evidence of drug use. They also identify other types of employee evaluations to which Bayesian modeling could be applied.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/47/4/610.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:47:y:1994:i:4:p:610-621

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in ILR Review from Cornell University, ILR School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().