Does it Matter WHO Responded to the Survey? Trends in the U.S. Gender Earnings Gap Revisited

Jungmin Lee and Sokbae (Simon) Lee

ILR Review, 2012, vol. 65, issue 1, 148-160

Abstract: Studies have shown a decreasing trend in the U.S. gender earnings gap since the 1980s. The authors work with a framework established by Blau and Kahn (1997 JOLE ; 2006 ILRR ), who used the Michigan Panel of Income Dynamics (PSID) to decompose that gap into observable and unobservable components in order to determine which contributing factors are gender-specific and which can be attributed to the wage structure. They extend the Blau and Kahn framework to consider measurement error due to the use of proxy/representative respondents of the survey's earnings variable. First, they find a trend toward more females in the gender composition of the household respondents, and second, they estimate the impact of that change on Blau and Kahn's decomposition. They determine that some of the changes in the gender earnings gap could actually be attributed to whether the surverys were self- or proxy-responded. That is, the actual reduction in the gender pay gap may be smaller than what the estimates—without taking into account the measurement error—might indicate. The authors suggest the need for a careful validation study to ascertain the extent of the spurious measurement error effects.

Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979391206500108 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Does it matter who responded to the survey? Trends in the U.S. gender earnings gap revisited (2011)
Working Paper: Does It Matter Who Responded to the Survey? Trends in the U.S. Gender Earnings Gap Revisited (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:65:y:2012:i:1:p:148-160

DOI: 10.1177/001979391206500108

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in ILR Review from Cornell University, ILR School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().