EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Academic Entrepreneurship: The Bayh-Dole Act versus the Professor’s Privilege

Thomas Åstebro, Serguey Braguinsky, Pontus Braunerhjelm and Anders Broström
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Anders Broström and Thomas Astebro

ILR Review, 2019, vol. 72, issue 5, 1094-1122

Abstract: Is the Bayh-Dole intellectual property regime associated with more and better academic entrepreneurship than the Professor’s Privilege regime? The authors examine data on US PhDs in the natural sciences, engineering, and medical fields who became entrepreneurs in 1993–2006 and compare this to similar data from Sweden. They find that, in both countries, those with an academic background have lower rates of entry into entrepreneurship than do those with a non-academic background. The relative rate of academics starting entrepreneurial firms is slightly lower in the United States than in Sweden. Moreover, the mean economic gains from becoming an entrepreneur are negative, both for PhDs originating in academia and for non-academic settings in both countries. Analysis indicates that selection into entrepreneurship occurs from the lower part of the ability distribution among academics. The results suggest that policies supporting entrepreneurial decisions by younger, tenure-track academics may be more effective than are general incentives to increase academic entrepreneurship.

Keywords: academic entrepreneurship; innovation; royalty sharing; Bayh-Dole; Professor’s Privilege (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019793918819809 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:72:y:2019:i:5:p:1094-1122

DOI: 10.1177/0019793918819809

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in ILR Review from Cornell University, ILR School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:72:y:2019:i:5:p:1094-1122