Skills for the Future? A Life Cycle Perspective on Systems of Vocational Education and Training
Amanda Chuan and
Christian Lyhne Ibsen
ILR Review, 2022, vol. 75, issue 3, 638-664
In this article, the authors ask how the institutional design of vocational education and training (VET) affects worker adaptability to changing skill demands over the life cycle. They compare two types of VET systems. Collectivist systems have high employer involvement and focus on specific skills, whereas Statist systems have lower employer involvement and focus more on general skills. Based on prior research demonstrating the importance of general skills in learning new skills, the authors hypothesize that worker adaptability will be higher in Statist VET systems than in Collectivist VET systems. Using a triple-difference model on data from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, they find that as age increases, a significantly steeper decline in worker adaptability occurs within Collectivist systems compared to Statist systems. Results provide an explanation behind the diminishing employment returns to employer-dominated VET systems found in prior studies.
Keywords: comparative political economy; education; employment; human capital; older workers; occupational skill requirements; skill-biased technical change; training; worker skills; skill training (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:75:y:2022:i:3:p:638-664
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in ILR Review from Cornell University, ILR School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().