Mediated Models for the Analysis of Confounded Variables and Self-Selected Samples

Michael H. Birnbaum and Barbara A. Mellers

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1989, vol. 14, issue 2, 146-158

Abstract: This paper addresses the interpretation of data that are contaminated by self-selected samples and/or lack of experimental control. Wainer (1989) reviewed different methods for treating self-selected samples and concluded that the most defensible approach is to model the process that caused the data to be missing. In concert with Wainer, the present paper emphasizes the value of specifying models; however, the theses of the present paper are that (a) any analysis should be interpreted in the context of a set of rival theoretical models, (b) these models should allow latent mediating variables that are imperfectly measured by observed variables, and (c) modeling brings clarity to the conclusion that confounded data can be misleading. Simple models clarify the limitations on conclusions one might otherwise attempt to draw from tainted data.

Keywords: correlation and causation; dropouts from treatment; mediated models; missing data; self-selected samples; selection bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986014002146 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:14:y:1989:i:2:p:146-158

DOI: 10.3102/10769986014002146

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().