On a Criterion for Combining Correlational Data

Marlos A. G. Viana

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1993, vol. 18, issue 3, 261-270

Abstract: To test the hypothesis of a positive correlation, consider the following plans: Plan A consists of combining k >1 independent sample correlations, each one based on N bivariate observations and a common correlation parameter. Plan B consists of observing a single correlation based on the same total kN bivariate observations. Plan C also requires the total of kN observations and differs from A only in that the sample sizes are not homogeneous. It is shown that B is the relatively optimal plan, whether the corresponding testing procedures are compared in terms of relative large sample power of the test, based on a weighted sum of the corresponding Fisher’s z transformations, or in terms of their Bayes relative risks; the interpretation is that correlations “avoid†averaging. In contrast, it is also shown that certain statistics “prefer†averaging, while others are “indifferent.†A characterization of these classes was obtained in terms of the order of magnitude of the rate of change in the signal-to-noise ratio of the corresponding statistic, with respect to N as the sample size N increases.

Keywords: combining studies; signal-to-noise ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986018003261 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:18:y:1993:i:3:p:261-270

DOI: 10.3102/10769986018003261

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().