Teacher’s Corner: A Note on Interpreting an R 2 Value

Carl J. Huberty

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1994, vol. 19, issue 4, 351-356

Abstract: It is suggested that the standard traditional null hypothesis of Ï 2 = 0 be reconsidered in favor of Ï 2 = E(R 2 ). The test of the latter hypothesis is discussed. Also discussed is an effect-size index that is the difference between an adjusted R 2 and E(R 2 ).

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986019004351 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:19:y:1994:i:4:p:351-356

DOI: 10.3102/10769986019004351

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().