Female and Male Admission to Graduate School: An Illustrative Inquiry*

Scott E. Maxwell and Lyle V. Jones

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1976, vol. 1, issue 1, 1-37

Abstract: Female and male admission rates to four graduate programs at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill are compared for 1972–73 and 1973–74. To assess possible sex-related bias in admission, rates are adjusted for applicant qualifications by analysis of covariance and by balancing. Guidelines for choosing between these two techniques are developed. The use of adjustment techniques for these data is shown to be justified in terms of Meehl’s analysis of the ex post facto design. Other adjustment procedures, direct and indirect standardization, are critically discussed. The adjusted admission rates reflect, in one case, i.e., for one program and one admission year, a slight advantage for male applicants over females, while in three cases, female applicants were granted a slight advantage over males in admission. In the remaining four cases, there is no evidence that sex of applicant, per se, played a role in admission decisions. Wherever a sex-related advantage is detected, the favored sex is that with the fewer applicants to the program. While the generalization of these results to other programs and other graduate schools is unwarranted, it is appropriate to emphasize the value of applying balancing and/or analysis of covariance to data that may be collected for the purpose of detecting possible discrimination in the selection or evaluation of identifiable population subgroups.

Keywords: Graduate Admission; Sex Bias; Adjustment Techniques; Analysis of Covariance; Balancing; Standardization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1976
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986001001001 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:1:y:1976:i:1:p:1-37

DOI: 10.3102/10769986001001001

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().