The Runs Test for Autocorrelated Errors: Unacceptable Properties

Bradley E. Huitema, Joseph W. McKean and Jinsheng Zhao

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1996, vol. 21, issue 4, 390-404

Abstract: The runs test is frequently recommended as a method of testing for nonindependent errors in time-series regression models. A Monte Carlo investigation was carried out to evaluate the empirical properties of this test using (a) several intervention and nonintervention regression models, (b) sample sizes ranging from 12 to 100, (c) three levels of α, (d) directional and nondirectional tests, and (e) 19 levels of autocorrelation among the errors. The results indicate that the runs test yields markedly asymmetrical error rates in the two tails and that neither directional nor nondirectional tests are satisfactory with respect to Type I error, even when the ratio of degrees of freedom to sample size is as high as .98. It is recommended that the test generally not be employed in evaluating the independence of the errors in time-series regression models.

Keywords: autocorrelation; independence; regression assumptions; runs test; time series (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986021004390 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:21:y:1996:i:4:p:390-404

DOI: 10.3102/10769986021004390

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().