Comparison of SPRT and Sequential Bayes Procedures for Classifying Examinees Into Two Categories Using a Computerized Test

Judith A. Spray and Mark D. Reckase

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1996, vol. 21, issue 4, 405-414

Abstract: Many testing applications focus on classifying examinees into one of two categories (e.g., pass/fail) rather than on obtaining an accurate estimate of level of ability. Examples of such applications include licensure and certification, college selection, and placement into entry-level or developmental college courses. With the increased availability of computers for the administration and scoring of tests, computerized testing procedures have been developed for efficiently making these classification decisions. The purpose of the research reported in this article was to compare two such procedures, one based on the sequential probability ratio test and the other on sequential Bayes methodology, to determine which required fewer items for classification when the procedures were matched on classification error rates. The results showed that under the conditions studied, the SPRT procedure required fewer test items than the sequential Bayes procedure to achieve the same level of classification accuracy.

Keywords: classification; computerized testing; sequential Bayes; sequential probability ratio test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986021004405 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:21:y:1996:i:4:p:405-414

DOI: 10.3102/10769986021004405

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().