 Bias Mechanisms in Intention-to-Treat Analysis With Data Subject to Treatment Noncompliance and Missing OutcomesBooil Jo Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2008, vol. 33, issue 2, 158-185 Abstract: An analytical approach was employed to compare sensitivity of causal effect estimates with different assumptions on treatment noncompliance and non-response behaviors. The core of this approach is to fully clarify bias mechanisms of considered models and to connect these models based on common parameters. Focusing on intention-to-treat analysis, systematic model comparisons are performed on the basis of explicit bias mechanisms and connectivity between models. The method is applied to the Johns Hopkins school intervention trial, where assessment of the intention-to-treat effect on school children’s mental health is likely to be affected by assumptions about intervention noncompliance and nonresponse at follow-up assessments. The example calls attention to the importance of focusing on each case in investigating relative sensitivity of causal effect estimates with different identifying assumptions, instead of pursuing a general conclusion that applies to every occasion. Keywords: intention-to-treat analysis; noncompliance; nonresponse; instrumental variable approach; bias mechanism; missing at random; missing completely at random; compound exclusion restriction (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:33:y:2008:i:2:p:158-185 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.