Standard Error Estimation of 3PL IRT True Score Equating With an MCMC Method

Yuming Liu, E. Matthew Schulz and Lei Yu

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2008, vol. 33, issue 3, 257-278

Abstract: A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method and a bootstrap method were compared in the estimation of standard errors of item response theory (IRT) true score equating. Three test form relationships were examined: parallel, tau-equivalent, and congeneric. Data were simulated based on Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary tests of the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills ® . For parallel and congeneric test forms within valid IRT true score ranges, the pattern and magnitude of standard errors of IRT true score equating estimated by the MCMC method were very close to those estimated by the bootstrap method. For tau-equivalent test forms, the pattern of standard errors estimated by the two methods was also similar. Bias and mean square errors of equating produced by the MCMC method were smaller than those produced by the bootstrap method; however, standard errors were larger. In educational testing, the MCMC method may be used as an additional or alternative procedure to the bootstrap method when evaluating the precision of equating results.

Keywords: MCMC; bootstrap; equating; standard error; IRT (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998607306076 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:33:y:2008:i:3:p:257-278

DOI: 10.3102/1076998607306076

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().