Lord’s Equity Theorem Revisited

Wim J. van der Linden
Additional contact information
Wim J. van der Linden: University of Twente

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2019, vol. 44, issue 4, 415-430

Abstract: Lord’s (1980) equity theorem claims observed-score equating to be possible only when two test forms are perfectly reliable or strictly parallel. An analysis of its proof reveals use of an incorrect statistical assumption. The assumption does not invalidate the theorem itself though, which can be shown to follow directly from the discrete nature of the equating problem it addresses. But, surprisingly, an obvious relaxation of the problem is enough to obtain exactly the opposite result: As long as two test forms measure the same ability, they can always be equated, no matter their reliability, degree of parallelness, or even difference in length. Also, in spite of its lack of validity, the original proof of Lord’s theorem has an important interim result directly applicable to the problem of assembling a new test form pre-equated to an old form.

Keywords: compound binomial distribution; equity; local equating; observed-score equating; Q-Q transformation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998619837627 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:44:y:2019:i:4:p:415-430

DOI: 10.3102/1076998619837627

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().