Concordance among Categorized Groups of Judges

James Beckett and William R. Schucany

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1979, vol. 4, issue 2, 125-137

Abstract: Analyzing the agreement between and within more than two groups of judges is presented in the form of an ANACONDA (Analysis of Concordance) Table. Also, the consensus ranking (for those groups which exhibit some agreement) of the k objects is determined using existing multiple comparison procedures based on Friedman rank sums.

Keywords: Agreement; Concordance; Multiple Comparisons (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1979
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986004002125 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:4:y:1979:i:2:p:125-137

DOI: 10.3102/10769986004002125

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().