A Game Theoretic Analysis of Olson's Game of Collective Action

Norman Schofield ()

Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1975, vol. 19, issue 3, 441-461

Abstract: Olson has argued that rational, self-interested individuals will not act to achieve their common goal or to satisfy their collective interests. Hardin interpreted the argument in terms of the classical prisoner's dilemma and offered a solution whereby the majority choice of the group would rationally be the joint cooperative strategy. The present paper considers the characteristic function of such a game and demonstrates that, within the terms of reference of game theory, there exists a solution in the sense that any coalition beyond a certain size must unanimously and rationally grow until it becomes the grand coalition. In other words the solution supposes that subgroups form within the primary group and considers the consequent, rational dynamics of the situation.

Date: 1975
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277501900303 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:19:y:1975:i:3:p:441-461

DOI: 10.1177/002200277501900303

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().