Class, State, and Revolution in Central America

Manus I. Midlarsky and Kenneth Roberts
Additional contact information
Kenneth Roberts: Center for International Relations and Department of Political Science, University of Colorado, Boulder

Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1985, vol. 29, issue 2, 163-193

Abstract: Models of revolutionary behavior in Central America are developed that rely initially on the distribution of landholdings. The scarcity of arable land—as in El Salvador, with its high population density—is suggested to result in high inequality, acute class polarization, and class-based redistributive revolutionary movements. A lesser degree of land scarcity, as in Nicaragua, should lead to a diminished extent of inequality, less acute class polarization, and multiclass, nonredistributive revolutionary coalitions. The behaviors of revolutionary movements in both El Salvador and Nicaragua conform to expectations. In turn, three types of state-class relations are developed. These are instrumentalist states in which the state is used as an instrument of control by the dominant class (El Salvador); personalist states in which a caudillo-type leader rules in large measure, independent of the dominant class (Nicaragua); and autonomous institutional states (Mexico), which have developed infrastructures of party and/ or government.

Date: 1985
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002785029002001 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:29:y:1985:i:2:p:163-193

DOI: 10.1177/0022002785029002001

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().